Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Creative Montessori Learning Centers v. Ashford Gear LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Creative Montessori Learning Centers v. Ashford Gear LLC Anchor | green | “misconduct by class counsel that creates a serious doubt that counsel will represent the class loyally requires denial of class certification.” | 7 |
| 2 | Larsen v. Union Bank, N.A. | green | “the typicality requirement is permissive: representative claims are 'typical' if they are reasonably co-extensive with those of absent class members; they need not be substantially identical.” | 4 |
| 3 | In re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litigation | green | “it is well-settled in the eleventh circuit that prior to the certification of a class, and before undertaking an analysis under rule 23, the district court must determine that at least one named class representative has article iii standing to raise each class claim.” | 3 |
| 4 | Randolph v. J.M. Smucker Co. | green | “in short, the commonality requirement requires proof the court can resolve the questions of law or fact in 'one stroke.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.