Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 126 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Tony Brummett v. Sinclair Broadcast Group, Incorporated.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tony Brummett v. Sinclair Broadcast Group, Incorporated Anchor | green | “a genuine issue of material fact arises only if sufficient evidence favoring the nonmoving party exists to permit a jury to return a verdict for that party.” | 70 |
| 2 | Edith McCurry v. Kenco Logistic Services, LLC | green | “we take this opportunity to reiterate that district judges may require strict compliance with local summary-judgment rules.” | 20 |
| 3 | Federal Trade Commission v. Bay Area Business Council, Inc. | green | “because of the important function local rules like rule 56.1 serve in organizing the evidence and identifying disputed facts, we have consistently upheld the district court's discretion to require strict compliance with those rules.” | 17 |
| 4 | Nicole Blow v. Bijora, Inc. | green | “construing all facts and inferences arising from them in favor of the party against whom the motion under consideration is made.” | 10 |
| 5 | Torres v. Alltown Bus Services | green | “since we have already held that it is not an abuse of discretion for a court to refuse to consider evidence whose manner of submission violated local rules, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion in this case.” | 5 |
| 6 | Burton v. Board of Regents | green | “to present facts or develop any legal arguments” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.