Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 127 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rodriguez v. Tennessee Laborers Health & Welfare Fund.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rodriguez v. Tennessee Laborers Health & Welfare Fund Anchor | green | “district courts have authority both under common law and rule 54(b) to reconsider interlocutory orders and to reopen any part of a case before entry of final judgment.” | 53 |
| 2 | Rodriguez v. Tennessee Laborers Health & Welfare Fund | green | “traditionally, courts will find justification for reconsidering interlocutory orders when there is (1) an intervening change of controlling law; (2) new evidence available; or (3) a need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice.” | 41 |
| 3 | Rodriguez v. Tennessee Laborers Health & Welfare Fund | green | “(1) an intervening change of controlling law; (2) new evidence available; or (3) a need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice.” | 14 |
| 4 | Gooch v. Life Investors Insurance Co. of America | green | “a district court may always reconsider and revise its interlocutory orders while it retains jurisdiction over the case.” | 10 |
| 5 | Stringer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | green | “where the communication is one in which the party has an interest and it is made to another having a corresponding interest.” | 5 |
| 6 | Toler v. Süd-Chemie, Inc. | green | “both actual malice and falsity . . . .” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.