Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re FA Potts & Co., Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re FA Potts & Co., Inc. Anchor | green | “this policy of finality protects confirmed sales unless compelling equities outweigh the interests in finality.” | 5 |
| 2 | In the Matter of Chung King, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of Michael T. Nigro | green | “if parties are to be encouraged to bid at judicial sales there must be stability and a time must come when a fair bid is accepted and the proceedings are ended.” | 4 |
| 3 | In re Gil-bern Industries, Inc. | green | “it is hornbook law that if the highest bid submitted at a judicial sale is manifestly inadequate, it need not be accepted.” | 4 |
| 4 | Mahoney v. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance | green | “this policy of finality protects confirmed sales unless compelling equities outweigh the interests in finality.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.