Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Mark Jessup.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Mark Jessup Anchor | green | “what is true in general is not true in his particular case....” | 8 |
| 2 | United States v. Jose Rafael Perez-Franco, United States v. Jose Luis Leon-Urena | green | “no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure' defendant's presence at trial....” | 6 |
| 3 | United States v. Juan Vargas | green | “no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure defendant's appearance ... and the safety of ... the community ...” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.