Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Planned Parenthood of Ind. & Ky., Inc. v. Comm'r of the Ind. State Dep't of Health.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Planned Parenthood of Ind. & Ky., Inc. v. Comm'r of the Ind. State Dep't of Health Anchor | green | “if a plaintiff is more likely to win, the balance of harms can weigh less heavily in its favor, but the less likely a plaintiff is to win, the more that balance would need to weigh in its favor.” | 7 |
| 2 | Jason Goodman, D.C. v. Illinois Department Of Financial And Professional Regulation | green | “a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary and drastic remedy, one that should not be granted unless the movant, by a clear showing, carries the burden of persuasion.” | 5 |
| 3 | Jason Goodman, D.C. v. Illinois Department Of Financial And Professional Regulation | green | “is an extraordinary and drastic remedy, one that should not be granted unless the movant, by a clear showing, carries the burden of persuasion.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.