Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pettrey v. Enterprise Title Agency, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pettrey v. Enterprise Title Agency, Inc. Anchor | green | “when the issues presented are no longer 'live' or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome.” | 9 |
| 2 | Joann Aamot v. Robert L. Kassel | green | “fed. r. civ. p. 41(a)(1) limits the plaintiff's authority to dismiss his complaint . . . without the permission of either the adverse party or the court to the period of time before the defendant files an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.