Topic: title vii's charge-filing requirement is a processing rule,… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #2396

7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 125 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fort Bend County v. Davis.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Fort Bend County v. Davis Anchor
scotus · 2019
green “title vii's charge-filing requirement is a processing rule, albeit a mandatory one, not a jurisdictional prescription delineating the adjudicatory authority of courts.” 39
2 Christine Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service Company
ca4 · 1996
green “only those discrimination claims stated in the initial charge, those reasonably related to the original complaint, and those developed by reasonable investigation of the original complaint may be maintained in a subsequent title vii lawsuit.” 29
3 Karen Balas v. Huntington Ingalls Industries
ca4 · 2013
green “reflects a congressional intent to use administrative conciliation as the primary means of handling claims, thereby encouraging quicker, less formal, and less expensive resolution of disputes.” 14
4 Kimberly Miles v. Dell, Incorporated, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus Supporting
ca4 · 2005
green “exhaustion requirement ensures that the employer is put on notice of the alleged violations so that the matter can be resolved out of court if possible.” 13
5 Puryear v. County Of Roanoke
ca4 · 2000
green “the aggrieved person may initiate a civil action based on the title vii claims made in her eeoc charge only after receipt of a right-to-sue letter.” 12
6 Kimberly Miles v. Dell, Incorporated, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus Supporting
ca4 · 2005
green “the aggrieved person may initiate a civil action based on the title vii claims made in her eeoc charge only after receipt of a right-to-sue letter.” 11
7 Kimberly Miles v. Dell, Incorporated, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus Supporting
ca4 · 2005
green “only those discrimination claims stated in the initial charge, those reasonably related to the original complaint, and those developed by reasonable investigation of the original complaint may be maintained in a subsequent title vii lawsuit.” 7

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check