Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 125 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from William W. Winpisinger v. Jack Watson, Secretary of the Cabinet and Assistant to the President for Intergovernmental Affairs.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | William W. Winpisinger v. Jack Watson, Secretary of the Cabinet and Assistant to the President for Intergovernmental Affairs Anchor | green | “would have to accept a number of very speculative inferences and assumptions in any endeavor to connect the alleged injury with the challenged conduct.” | 33 |
| 2 | Florida Audubon Society v. Lloyd M. Bentsen, Secretary of the Treasury, and Margaret Richardson, Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service | green | “a showing of standing is an essential and unchanging predicate to any exercise of a court's jurisdiction.” | 26 |
| 3 | Sierra Club v. Environmental Protection Agency | green | “plaintiff can no longer rest on such mere allegations, but must set forth by affidavit or other evidence specific facts which for purposes of the summary judgment motion will be taken to be true.” | 21 |
| 4 | Tozzi v. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | green | “purely speculative, which is the ultimate label for injuries too implausible to support standing.” | 16 |
| 5 | Raytheon Co. v. Ashborn Agencies, Ltd. | green | “article iii standing must be resolved as threshold matter.” | 12 |
| 6 | Florida Audubon Society v. Lloyd M. Bentsen, Secretary of the Treasury, and Margaret Richardson, Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service | green | “a showing of standing 'is an essential and unchanging' predicate to any exercise of a court's jurisdiction.” | 11 |
| 7 | City of Waukesha v. Environmental Protection Agency | green | “that it is substantially probable that the procedural breach will cause the essential injury to the plaintiffs own interest.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.