Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from A.D. Brokaw v. Karen Weaver, Mercer County, State of Illinois.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A.D. Brokaw v. Karen Weaver, Mercer County, State of Illinois Anchor | green | “whether the federal plaintiff seeks to set aside a state court judgment or whether he is, in fact, presenting an independent claim.” | 8 |
| 2 | Leroy Epps and Robert Venable, III v. Creditnet, Inc. | green | “an action in federal court that alleges an injury 'inextricably intertwined' with a state court decision, such that success in the federal court would require overturning the state court decision, is barred by the rooker-feldman doctrine.” | 5 |
| 3 | Leroy Epps and Robert Venable, III v. Creditnet, Inc. | green | “success in the federal court would require overturning the state court decision,” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.