Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from H v. Collins Co. v. Williams.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | H v. Collins Co. v. Williams Anchor | green | “it is well settled that a necessary predicate to this court's exercise of jurisdiction is an actual, justiciable controversy.” | 4 |
| 2 | Hallsmith-Sysco Food Services, LLC v. Marques | green | “this court will not decide a question if it would fail to have a practical effect on an actual controversy.” | 4 |
| 3 | Cicilline v. Almond | green | “whenever a court acts without the presence of a justiciable case or controversy, its judicial power to do so is at its weakest ebb” | 3 |
| 4 | Hallsmith-Sysco Food Services, LLC v. Marques | green | “a case is moot if the original complaint raised a justiciable controversy, but events occurring after the filing have deprived the litigant of a continuing stake in the controversy.” | 3 |
| 5 | Hallsmith-Sysco Food Services, LLC v. Marques | green | “this court has consistently held that a case is moot if the original complaint raised a justiciable controversy, but events occurring after the filing have deprived the litigant of a continuing stake in the controversy.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.