Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Marriage of Bojrab v. Bojrab.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marriage of Bojrab v. Bojrab Anchor | green | “is inconsistent with the requirements of the custody modification statute.” | 5 |
| 2 | Mosley v. Mosley | green | “a provisional order is temporary in nature and terminates when the final dissolution decree is entered or the petition for dissolution is dismissed.” | 5 |
| 3 | Marriage of Bojrab v. Bojrab | green | “a determination of present custody under carefully designated conditions.” | 4 |
| 4 | Klotz v. Klotz | green | “provisional orders are temporary orders that suffice until a full evidentiary hearing can be held” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.