Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Vermont Small Business Development Corp. v. Fifth Son Corp., Henzel, Mad Partners, LLC and Pierson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vermont Small Business Development Corp. v. Fifth Son Corp., Henzel, Mad Partners, LLC and Pierson Anchor | green | “there is no reason to require less 'punctilious compliance' with terms of a lease providing for notice in the nonresidential context.” | 4 |
| 2 | Christos Panagiotidis and Hrisanthi Panagiotidis v. Alexander Galanis | green | “we did not intend to suggest that, in a nonresidential context, we would refuse to accept a form of notice that is at least as effective, and actually more certain, than that provided in the lease.” | 4 |
| 3 | In Re Soon Kwon | green | “have been insistent upon the landlord's punctilious compliance with all statutory eviction procedures, including notice provisions.” | 3 |
| 4 | In Re Soon Kwon | green | “landlord's punctilious compliance with all statutory eviction procedures, including notice provisions.” | 3 |
| 5 | Andrus v. Dunbar | green | “that the superior court has no jurisdiction over an eviction action unless proper notice is served in accordance with statutory requirements.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.