Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from STATE DEPT. OF BUS. REG. v. Salvation Ltd..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | STATE DEPT. OF BUS. REG. v. Salvation Ltd. Anchor | green | “it is axiomatic that an administrative rule cannot enlarge, modify or contravene the provisions of a statute.” | 5 |
| 2 | State Ex Rel. Victor Chemical Works v. Gay | green | “a refund is a matter of grace and if the statute of non-claim is not complied with, the statute becomes an effective bar in law and in equity.” | 4 |
| 3 | STATE EX REL SZABO FOOD SERV., INC., OF NC v. Dickinson | green | “paid by the purchaser or consumer.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.