Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Round Hill General Improvement District v. Newman.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Round Hill General Improvement District v. Newman Anchor | green | “a writ of mandamus will issue when the respondent has a clear, present legal duty to act.” | 4 |
| 2 | Redeker v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clark | green | “this court considers whether judicial economy and sound judicial administration militate for or against issuing the writ.” | 4 |
| 3 | Redeker v. Dist. Ct. | green | “this court considers whether judicial economy and sound judicial administration militate for or against issuing the writ.” | 3 |
| 4 | Young v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF PERSHING CTY. | green | “carry out a district court's powers and duties in the administration of justice” | 3 |
| 5 | Angell v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada | green | “is generally responsible for providing a suitable and sufficient trial facility and necessary court personnel.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.