Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Hyman.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Hyman Anchor | green | “judicial deference to agency expertise is a guiding precept where the interpretation and application of broad or ambiguous statutory language by an administrative tribunal are the subject of review.” | 5 |
| 2 | Camara v. Agsalud | green | “to be granted deference, ... the agency's decision must be consistent with the legislative purpose.” | 5 |
| 3 | Brown v. Thompson | green | “well established rule of statutory construction that, where an administrative agency is charged with the responsibility of carrying out the mandate of a statute which contains words of broad and indefinite meaning, courts accord persuasive weight to administrative construction a…” | 4 |
| 4 | State v. Dillingham Corp. | green | “neither official construction or usage, no matter how long indulged in, can be successfully invoked to defeat the purpose and effect of a statute which is free from ambiguity....” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.