Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Giddens.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Giddens Anchor | green | “our case law has long held that a witness may not vouch for the credibility of a victim.” | 8 |
| 2 | State v. Lark | green | “a sexual act is an immoral, improper or indecent touching or act by the defendant upon the child.” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. Cole | green | “her interview was a tentative disclosure,” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Giddens | green | “a witness may not vouch for the credibility of a victim.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.