Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Chatman v. Mancill.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chatman v. Mancill Anchor | green | “appellate delay is prejudicial when there is a reasonable probability that, but for the delay, the result of the appeal would have been different.” | 7 |
| 2 | Hyden v. State | green | “in evaluating a trial court's decision to deny a speedy appeal claim, we must accept the factual findings of the trial court unless they are clearly erroneous, and we must accept the ultimate conclusion of the trial court unless it amounts to an abuse of discretion.” | 3 |
| 3 | Veal v. State | green | “we have repeatedly found that the failure to make a showing of prejudice in an appellate delay claim is fatal to the claim, even when the other three factors weigh in the appellant's favor.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.