Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Francies v. Francies.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Francies v. Francies Anchor | green | “willful disobedience of any lawfully entered court order of which the offender had notice is indirect contempt.” | 9 |
| 2 | Srivastava v. Indianapolis Hebrew Congregation, Inc. | green | “involves disobedience of a court which undermines the court's authority, justice, and dignity.” | 5 |
| 3 | Srivastava v. Indianapolis Hebrew Congregation, Inc. | green | “contempt of court involves disobedience of a court which undermines the court's authority, justice, and dignity.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.