Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 123 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fikes v. City of Daphne.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fikes v. City of Daphne Anchor | green | “although defendant did not expressly request the remedy available to 6 him under rule 12(e), the court has the 'inherent authority' to act on its own and sua sponte 7 direct a plaintiff to replead a complaint.” | 41 |
| 2 | Wagner v. First Horizon Pharmaceutical Corporation | green | “we also remind 2 district courts of their supervisory obligation to sua sponte order repleading pursuant to 3 federal rule of civil procedure 12(e) when a shotgun complaint fails to link adequately a 4 cause of action to its factual predicates.” | 41 |
| 3 | Cobb v. Marshall | green | “we also remind 2 district courts of their supervisory obligation to sua sponte order repleading pursuant to 3 federal rule of civil procedure 12(e) when a shotgun complaint fails to link adequately a 4 cause of action to its factual predicates.” | 41 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.