Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Greg Landers v. Quality Communications, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Greg Landers v. Quality Communications, Inc. Anchor | green | “allege facts demonstrating there was at least one workweek in which they worked in excess of forty hours and were not paid overtime wages.” | 5 |
| 2 | Park Pet Shop, Inc. v. City of Chicago | green | “pike balancing is triggered only when the challenged law discriminates against interstate commerce in practical application.” | 5 |
| 3 | Minerva Dairy, Inc. v. Harsdorf | green | “if the state law affects commerce without any reallocation among jurisdictions and does not give local firms any competitive advantage over those located elsewhere, we apply the normal rational basis standard.” | 4 |
| 4 | Minerva Dairy, Inc. v. Harsdorf | green | “that limits states' abilities to restrict interstate commerce.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.