Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Bryant.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Bryant Anchor | green | “it is well settled that the scope of cross-examination is within the sound discretion of the trial court” | 5 |
| 2 | The People v.Raymond Denson | green | “evidence of a defendant's prior bad acts may be admitted to prove the crime charged when the evidence tends to establish,” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. LaCroce | green | “it is well established that 'the granting of an adjournment for any purpose is a matter resting within the sound discretion of the trial court” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Holmes | green | “proof of defendant's conviction of a subsequent unrelated crime” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Smith | green | “the probative value of the evidence outweighed its prejudicial effect” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.