Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Weeks.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Weeks Anchor | green | “does not, by itself, render the statements involuntary” | 5 |
| 2 | People v. Branch | green | “falls within the broad discretion allowed a trial court in its management of a trial” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Gajadhar | green | “in order to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel based on a single error or omission, a defendant must demonstrate that the error was 'so egregious and prejudicial' as to deprive defendant of a fair trial” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Knapp | green | “the totality of the circumstances surrounding the interrogation” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Ramos | neutral | “implicates his relationship with his trial attorney and is to be proved, if at all, by facts outside the trial record,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.