Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Loomis v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Loomis v. United States Anchor | green | “not what the law now is, but what the government was substantially justified in believing it to have been.” | 8 |
| 2 | Gargoyles, Inc. v. United States | green | “in the context of eaja claims, we have held that the 'position of the united states' in judicial proceedings refers to the united states' position 'throughout the dispute, including not only its litigating position but also the agency's administrative position.” | 6 |
| 3 | Manno v. United States | green | “can be justified even though it is incorrect.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.