Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Baker v. State of Oregon.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baker v. State of Oregon Anchor | green | “without exception, requires all post-conviction petitions challenging convictions that became final before august 5, 1989, to have been filed no later than november 4, 1994.” | 5 |
| 2 | Mastne v. Schiedler | green | “not contain an escape clause per- mitting a delayed petition.” | 4 |
| 3 | Baker v. State of Oregon | green | “the common law writ of habeas corpus has not been a remedy available to a person who is no longer in custody.” | 4 |
| 4 | Harlukowicz v. State of Oregon | neutral | “the supreme court vacated our deci- sion in baker and remanded on the petitioner's unopposed motion under sb 321 (2023), oregon laws 2023, chapter 368, section 1(5), which created a mechanism for people to pursue otherwise time-barred challenges to convictions based on nonunanim…” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.