Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Jahsir Claybrooks.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Jahsir Claybrooks Anchor | green | “review all sentences-whether inside, just outside, or significantly outside the sentencing guidelines range-under a deferential abuse-of-discretion standard.” | 5 |
| 2 | United States v. Jahsir Claybrooks | green | “this court reviews all sentences-whether inside, just outside, or significantly outside the guidelines range-under a deferential abuse-of-discretion standard.” | 5 |
| 3 | United States v. Mikkel McKinnie | green | “second, we consider whether the sentence imposed was substantively reasonable.” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. Jason Kokinda | green | “we first must ensure that the district court did not commit a significant procedural error.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.