Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Robert Lee-Kendrick v. Scott Eckstein.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robert Lee-Kendrick v. Scott Eckstein Anchor | green | “the court actually relied on the procedural bar as an independent basis for its disposition of the case.” | 5 |
| 2 | Eric Blackmon v. Tarry Williams | green | “the miscarriage of justice exception 'applies only in the rare case where the petitioner can prove that he is actually innocent of the crime of which he has been convicted.” | 4 |
| 3 | Robert Lee-Kendrick v. Scott Eckstein | green | “a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under wisconsin statute 974.02 is part of a direct appeal rather than a request for collateral review.” | 4 |
| 4 | Prentice Sanders v. Dylon Radtke | green | “when reviewing a district court's ruling on a habeas corpus petition, we review the district court's factual findings for clear error and rulings on issues of law de novo.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.