Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Taylor.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Taylor Anchor | green | “the 'probable' component of the probable cause determination means that the state must produce evidence that 'raises more than a mere suspicion of guilt, but need not provide evidence proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 5 |
| 2 | State v. Iacona | green | “charged with evaluating whether sufficient credible evidence exists” | 5 |
| 3 | In re A.J.S. | green | “determinations regarding witness credibility, but will review de novo the legal conclusion whether the state presented sufficient evidence to demonstrate probable cause to believe that the juvenile committed the acts charged.” | 4 |
| 4 | In re A.J.S. | green | “the state must present credible evidence of every element of an offense to support a finding of probable cause, but that evidence does not have to be unassailable.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.