Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Snook.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Snook Anchor | green | “if there is no ambiguity in the language, we presume the legislature meant what it said and the plain meaning of the statute governs.” | 8 |
| 2 | Joyce v. Ford Motor Co. | green | “to determine the plain language of statutory language, courts often look to dictionaries.” | 3 |
| 3 | Lafferty v. Wells Fargo Bank | green | “hold-to the extent the laffertys have causes of action against geweke that are also valid against wells fargo by operation of the holder rule-their recovery is limited to the amount they have paid under the installment contract.” | 3 |
| 4 | Lafferty v. Wells Fargo Bank | green | “mechanical and electrical failures were never remedied even though geweke repeatedly assured them the problems would be fixed.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.