Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Tappan Wire & Cable, Inc. v. County of Rockland.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tappan Wire & Cable, Inc. v. County of Rockland Anchor | green | “is not entitled to governmental immunity arising out of claims that it negligently maintained the sewerage system as these claims challenge conduct which is ministerial in nature” | 8 |
| 2 | Tappan Wire & Cable, Inc. v. County of Rockland | green | “arising out of claims that it negligently designed a sewerage system” | 4 |
| 3 | Tappan Wire & Cable, Inc. v. County of Rockland | green | “arising out of claims that it negligently designed the sewerage system” | 3 |
| 4 | Fireman's Fund Insurance v. County of Nassau | green | “it regularly inspected and maintained the subject sewer line” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.