Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Velez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Velez Anchor | green | “lying on the bed, nude from the waist down, with her knees up and defendant's head between her legs.” | 6 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Velez | green | “the victim would not have had her pants removed and her legs in that position absent previous contact by the defendant, either verbal or physical.” | 4 |
| 3 | Com. v. Davis, E. | green | “unlawful communication with a minor,” | 4 |
| 4 | Commonwealth v. Velez | green | “that he unlawfully communicated with the victim for purposes of engaging in the prohibited sex acts.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.