Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Chanel, Inc. v. Replicachanelbag.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chanel, Inc. v. Replicachanelbag Anchor | green | “because the defendant is not held to admit facts that are not well pleaded or to admit conclusions of law, the court must first determine whether there is a sufficient basis in the pleading for the judgment to be entered.” | 9 |
| 2 | Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. Hernandez | green | “a 'defendant, by his default, admits the plaintiff's well-pleaded allegations of fact' as set forth in the operative complaint.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.