Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Eugene R. Orner v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of the United States Department of Health & Human Services.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eugene R. Orner v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of the United States Department of Health & Human Services Anchor | green | “unlike its counterparts, rule 60(b)(4), which provides relief from void judgments, 'is not subject to any time limitation.” | 4 |
| 2 | Woodall v. City of El Paso | green | “the aim of the court on review is to determine whether a rationale jury could reach the conclusion that the jury actually reached.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Boch Oldsmobile, Inc., Boch Toyota, Inc., and Ernest J. Boch | green | “in the interests of finality, the concept of void judgments is narrowly construed.” | 3 |
| 4 | Southern Shipbuilding Corp. v. Richardson | green | “tentative settlement has been agreed upon.” | 3 |
| 5 | Snowden v. Huey P. Long Memorial Hospital ex rel. State, Department of Health & Human Resources | green | “in approving a minor's settlement, a court must not only grant authority to compromise to the party properly representing the minor, but must also determine whether the terms of the proposed compromise are in the best interests of the minor.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.