Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Joseph Dillon v. City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joseph Dillon v. City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation Anchor | green | “rule 62(d) of the federal rules of civil procedure allows an appellant to obtain an automatic stay of execution of judgment pending appeal by posting a bond.” | 4 |
| 2 | Leray W. Hebert, Jr. v. Exxon Corporation, Trinity Industries, Inc. v. Ina of Texas v. Albany Insurance Company, in Re Albany Insurance Company | green | “rule 62(d) of the federal rules of civil procedure allows an appellant to obtain an automatic stay of execution of judgment pending appeal by posting a bond.” | 3 |
| 3 | Enrique Diaz v. Dennis Shallbetter | green | “amendments may or may not govern 'further proceedings' in pending cases," but the "just and practicable" standard and the rules enabling act "say only that new acts in cases already on the docket ordinarily should conform to the new rules” | 3 |
| 4 | HSBC Bank USA v. Kirkland Townsend | green | “expressly recognizes the court's authority to dissolve the automatic stay or supersede it by a courtordered stay,” | 3 |
| 5 | Central Trust Co. v. Peoria, D. & E. Ry. Co. | green | “we cannot fail to observe that the main scope and purpose of this appeal seem to be to relitigate questions fully determined by the final decree appealed from and affirmed.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.