Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from A. Griffin v. City of Opa-Locka.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A. Griffin v. City of Opa-Locka Anchor | green | “a person acts under color of state law when he acts with authority possessed by virtue of his employment with the state.” | 10 |
| 2 | Motes v. Myers | green | “section 1983 plaintiffs must establish both deprivation of a right secured by the united states constitution or federal laws and action by a defendant under color of state law.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.