Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Geovanni Quintero Rendon.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Geovanni Quintero Rendon Anchor | green | “a district court's enhancement of a defendant's offense level based on his role as an organizer or leader is a finding of fact reviewed for clear error.” | 7 |
| 2 | United States v. Oleg Zlatogur | green | “sufficient indicia of reliability, the district court makes explicit findings of fact as to credibility, and the defendant has an opportunity to rebut the evidence.” | 6 |
| 3 | United States v. Henry Louis Ismond and Winston Daniel Fraser | green | “must establish the quantity of drugs by the preponderance of the evidence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.