Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 canonical passages across 10 cases, quoted by 634 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Johnson v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Johnson v. State Anchor | green | “often turns on an evaluation of credibility and demeanor, and those jurors were in attendance when the testimony was delivered.” | 225 |
| 2 | Watson v. State | green | “harbor a subjective level of reasonable doubt to overturn the conviction.” | 112 |
| 3 | Matson v. State | green | “must presume-even if it does not affirmatively appear in the record-that the trier of fact resolved any such conflict in favor of the prosecution, and must defer to that resolution.” | 79 |
| 4 | Johnson v. State | green | “particularly those determinations concerning the weight and credibility of the evidence.” | 75 |
| 5 | Steadman, Brunshae | green | “particularly those determinations concerning the weight and credibility of the evidence.” | 53 |
| 6 | Matson v. State | green | “must presume - even if it does not affirmatively appear in the record - that the trier of fact resolved any such conflict in favor of the prosecution, and must defer to that resolution.” | 28 |
| 7 | Simpson v. State | green | “so prejudicial that expenditure of further time and expense would be wasteful and futile,” | 26 |
| 8 | Brown v. State | green | “required to meet the same rigorous criteria for sufficiency as circumstantial proof of other offensive elements.” | 13 |
| 9 | Lenoir v. Kerley | green | “to avoid intruding on the jury's role as arbiter of the weight and credibility of the evidence, a factual sufficiency review remains deferential to the jury's verdict” | 9 |
| 10 | Moreno Denoso v. State | green | “outside the zone of reasonable disagreement.” | 6 |
| 11 | Cain v. State | green | “does not 'clearly' criminalize having a government subordinate miss work to set up a personal computer at a house,” | 5 |
| 12 | Ex Parte Bartmess | green | “with the intent to commit the murder of alberta williams” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.