Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cole v. Young.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cole v. Young Anchor | green | “there is a reasonable basis for the view that an agency head who must bear the responsibility for the protection of classified information committed to his custody should have the final say in deciding whether to repose his trust in an employee who has access to such information.” | 8 |
| 2 | Robert Larry Adams v. Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defense | green | “grant or denial of security clearances ... an inexact science at best.” | 4 |
| 3 | Daniel Molerio v. Federal Bureau of Investigation | green | “to be denied clearance on unspecified grounds in no way implies disloyalty or any other repugnant characteristic.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.