Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Barbara J. Kemp v. International Business Machines Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barbara J. Kemp v. International Business Machines Corporation Anchor | green | “non-erisa benefits do not fall within erisa's reach merely because they are included in a multibenefit plan along with erisa benefits.” | 6 |
| 2 | Jeneal Meredith v. Time Insurance Company | green | “these regulations prevent meredith from being simultaneously an employer and an employee.” | 4 |
| 3 | James W. Robertson v. Alexander Grant & Company, Etc. | green | “they are independent plans under erisa” | 3 |
| 4 | William O’Neal WHITT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHERMAN INT’L CORP., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees | green | “no federal question jurisdiction exists” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.