Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Whitney v. Heckler.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whitney v. Heckler Anchor | green | “it is well established that government price regulation does not constitute a taking of property where the regulated group is not required to participate in the regulated industry.” | 8 |
| 2 | Yee v. City of Escondido | green | “the takings clause requires compensation if the government authorizes a compelled physical invasion of property” | 5 |
| 3 | St. Francis Hospital Center v. Heckler | green | “retain full rights and control over their net investment” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.