Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hubbard v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hubbard v. United States Anchor | green | “in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the united states.” | 8 |
| 2 | Liberation News Service v. Eastland | green | “in enacting 1361 and 1391(e), congress was thinking solely in terms of the executive branch.” | 3 |
| 3 | King v. Russell | green | “judicial administrative function” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Deborah Gore Dean | green | “narrowed the reach of 1001 to matters within the executive branch, a coverage consistent with both the common usage of 'department' and that term's definition in title 18.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.