Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States Ex Rel. Batiste v. SLM Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States Ex Rel. Batiste v. SLM Corp. Anchor | green | “to bring a qui tam action in the government's name, and to recover a portion of the proceeds of the action, subject to the requirements of the statute.” | 7 |
| 2 | Walker v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC | green | “pro se parties may not pursue qui tam actions on behalf of the united states.” | 5 |
| 3 | United States Ex Rel. Fisher v. Network Software Associates | green | “courts in this jurisdiction consistently have held that pro se plaintiffs . . . are not adequately able to represent the interests of the united states” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.