Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Thomas, Oscar v. Principi, Anthony.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thomas, Oscar v. Principi, Anthony Anchor | green | “construe the complaint liberally, granting plaintiff the benefit of all inferences that can be derived from the facts alleged.” | 12 |
| 2 | Himex Co. v. United States | green | “because the court may not address the plaintiff's claims without subject-matter jurisdiction, a motion to dismiss under rule 12(b)(1) also imposes an affirmative obligation on the court to ensure that jurisdiction is proper.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.