Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Public Power Council v. Peter Johnson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Public Power Council v. Peter Johnson Anchor | green | “insure there will be a full presentation of the issues to it.” | 4 |
| 2 | Public Power Council v. Peter Johnson | green | “neglected to mention a serious environmental consequence” | 4 |
| 3 | Mark Abramowitz v. United States Environmental Protection Agency | green | “will engage in a substantial inquiry, but it must not substitute its own judgment for that of the agency.” | 4 |
| 4 | National Wildlife Federation v. Burford | green | “some caution must be taken to avoid overstating the breadth of the johnson decision.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.