Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 2,297 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Walker v. Schult.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walker v. Schult Anchor | green | “the officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in ifp cases.” | 1,075 |
| 2 | Meilleur v. Strong | green | “as long as the plaintiff proceeding ifp provides the information necessary to identify the defendant, the marshals' failure to effect service automatically constitutes 'good cause' for an extension of time within the meaning of rule 4(m).” | 604 |
| 3 | Murray v. Pataki | green | “as long as the plaintiff proceeding ifp provides the information necessary to identify the defendant, the marshals' failure to effect service automatically constitutes 'good cause' for an extension of time within the meaning of rule 4(m).” | 508 |
| 4 | Walker v. Schult | green | “the officers of the court shall issue and serve all process ... in ifp cases.” | 110 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.