Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Gaetano Modica.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Gaetano Modica Anchor | green | “the severity of the misconduct; the measures adopted to cure the misconduct; and the certainty of conviction absent the improper statements.” | 10 |
| 2 | Steven Garofolo v. Philip Coomb, Superintendent, Eastern New York Correctional Facility | green | “constitutional error occurs only when the prosecutorial remarks were so prejudicial that they rendered the trial in question fundamentally unfair.” | 3 |
| 3 | Steven Garofolo v. Philip Coomb, Superintendent, Eastern New York Correctional Facility | green | “the prosecutorial remarks were so prejudicial that they rendered the trial in question fundamentally unfair.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.