Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Celotex Corp. v. AIU Insurance (In Re Celotex Corp.).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Celotex Corp. v. AIU Insurance (In Re Celotex Corp.) Anchor | green | “under these standards, a court will permit an interlocutory appeal of an order if (1) the order presents a controlling question of law (2) over which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion among courts, and (3) the immediate resolution of the issue would materiall…” | 6 |
| 2 | In Re Club Associates | green | “freely examines the applicable principles of law to see if they were properly applied and freely examines the evidence in support of any particular finding to see if it meets the test of substantiality.” | 4 |
| 3 | Wilborn v. Gallagher (In Re Wilborn) | green | “neither party moved for leave to appeal; however, the panel has authority under fed. r. bankr.p. 8003 to treat a notice of appeal as a motion for leave to appeal.” | 3 |
| 4 | Celotex Corp. v. AIU Insurance (In Re Celotex Corp.) | green | “a district court will look to the standards which govern interlocutory appeals from the district court to the court of appeals pursuant to 28 u.s.c. 1292 (b).” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.