Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bob Backman v. James A. Spagon.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bob Backman v. James A. Spagon Anchor | green | “an easement is the right to use the land of another for a specific purpose that is not inconsistent with the general use of the property by the owner.” | 4 |
| 2 | Attaway v. Davis | green | “a way of necessity having been created by implication for the benefit of the grantee of the dominant estate or his successors thereafter, it cannot be extinguished so long as the necessity continues to exist.” | 4 |
| 3 | William C. Haak Trust v. Wilusz | green | “the right to an easement of necessity does not expire or attach itself to a particular owner; there is no statute of limitations on easement of necessity and the right to one does not expire upon transfer of either the dominant or servient estates.” | 4 |
| 4 | Hinrichs v. Melton | green | “an easement by necessity cannot be extinguished as long as the necessity exists.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.