Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 121 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Walters v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walters v. State Anchor | green | “outside the zone of reasonable disagreement.” | 76 |
| 2 | Caldwell v. State | green | “the focus of which is whether the appellant proffered a proper question concerning a proper area of inquiry.” | 8 |
| 3 | Sells v. State | green | “must show that he was prevented from asking particular questions that were proper.” | 7 |
| 4 | Sells v. State | green | “that the trial court generally disapproved of an area of inquiry from which proper questions could have been formulated is not enough because the trial court might have allowed the proper question had it been submitted for the court's consideration.” | 7 |
| 5 | Caldwell v. State | green | “must first determine if the appellant proffered a proper question” | 5 |
| 6 | Davis v. State | green | “the sufficiency of the predicate for admitting evidence is also within the sound discretion of the trial court.” | 4 |
| 7 | Caldwell v. State | green | “potentially, a wide range of specific questions-both proper and improper-could be asked within a proper subject area.” | 4 |
| 8 | Black v. State | green | “when venue is made an issue in the trial court, failure to prove venue in the county of prosecution constitutes reversible error.” | 4 |
| 9 | Stefanoff v. State | green | “section 9.22(1) requires the defendant to first bring forward evidence of a specific imminent harm.” | 3 |
| 10 | Hall v. State | green | “the facts required to establish the commission of the charged offense” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.