Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Manning v. Boston Medical Center Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manning v. Boston Medical Center Corp. Anchor | green | “demonstrate that the plaintiffs were employed 'for a workweek longer than forty hours' and that any hours worked in excess of forty per week were not compensated 'at a rate not less than one and one-half times the regular rate.” | 4 |
| 2 | Trezvant v. Fidelity Employer Services Corp. | green | “after discovery is complete, the court makes a final 'similarly situated' determination.” | 4 |
| 3 | Trezvant v. Fidelity Employer Services Corp. | green | “this determination is made using a fairly lenient standard, which typically results in conditional certification.” | 4 |
| 4 | Cunha v. Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC | green | “that there is 'some factual support'-as opposed to mere allegations-that the potential plaintiffs are similarly situated.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.